me88
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
68.90 / 100
Evidence 58.90 + awareness 10 = 68.90★★★★★3.45 / 5
- Information coverage
- 87%
- Evidence confidence
- 58.79/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +2 / 5
- Brand awareness bonus
- +10 / 10
Casino Rankings
Malaysia Casino Rankings
Compare ranks, overall scores, information coverage and evidence confidence. Open an assessment to see how each score is supported.
Current results
Casino Rankings
Provisional order by composite score
BK8
BK8
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
68.52 / 100
Evidence 58.52 + awareness 10 = 68.52★★★★★3.43 / 5
- Information coverage
- 69%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.58/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +2 / 5
- Brand awareness bonus
- +10 / 10
711CUCI
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
61.18 / 100
★★★★★3.06 / 5
- Information coverage
- 85%
- Evidence confidence
- 59.47/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
SUKA2CUCI
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
59.52 / 100
★★★★★2.98 / 5
- Information coverage
- 84%
- Evidence confidence
- 59.46/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
1XROLL
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
59.46 / 100
★★★★★2.97 / 5
- Information coverage
- 74%
- Evidence confidence
- 59.39/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
7Slots
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
58.43 / 100
★★★★★2.92 / 5
- Information coverage
- 83%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.0/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
CLUB33
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
57.47 / 100
★★★★★2.87 / 5
- Information coverage
- 87%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.0/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
KKSlots
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
53.70 / 100
★★★★★2.69 / 5
- Information coverage
- 81%
- Evidence confidence
- 58.33/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
MB8
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
53.69 / 100
Evidence 45.69 + awareness 8 = 53.69★★★★★2.68 / 5
- Information coverage
- 58%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.0/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
- Brand awareness bonus
- +8 / 10
100CUCI
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
53.45 / 100
★★★★★2.67 / 5
- Information coverage
- 58%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.0/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
Bila2Cuci
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
52.63 / 100
★★★★★2.63 / 5
- Information coverage
- 76%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.0/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
96CUCI
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
51.33 / 100
★★★★★2.57 / 5
- Information coverage
- 75%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.0/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
MOHD88
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
49.30 / 100
★★★★★2.46 / 5
- Information coverage
- 71%
- Evidence confidence
- 59.37/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
KK8
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
48.48 / 100
★★★★★2.42 / 5
- Information coverage
- 66%
- Evidence confidence
- 58.64/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
UEA8
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
48.41 / 100
Evidence 40.41 + awareness 8 = 48.41★★★★★2.42 / 5
- Information coverage
- 73%
- Evidence confidence
- 59.38/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
- Brand awareness bonus
- +8 / 10
Maxim88
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
47.30 / 100
★★★★★2.36 / 5
- Information coverage
- 74%
- Evidence confidence
- 60.0/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
MAXWIN996
Public information · Provisional rankingComposite score
46.75 / 100
★★★★★2.34 / 5
- Information coverage
- 77%
- Evidence confidence
- 59.42/100
- Licence evidence bonus
- +0 / 5
Stars = public-information score ÷ 20; these are not player ratings. Logos come from public platform pages. See each assessment for evidence and unknowns.
Side-by-side comparison
Category score comparison
Provisional top three · Known-evidence dimension scores / 100 · Known weight shown separately
| Assessment categories | me88 | BK8 | 711CUCI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operator & platform historyWeight 15% | 100.00 / 100 Information coverage 11/15 | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 15/15 | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 11/15 |
| Payments & withdrawalsWeight 25% | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 23/25 | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 23/25 | 58.70 / 100 Information coverage 23/25 |
| Support & complaintsWeight 15% | 30.00 / 100 Information coverage 15/15 | 61.11 / 100 Information coverage 9/15 | 100.00 / 100 Information coverage 9/15 |
| Games & informationWeight 15% | 73.33 / 100 Information coverage 15/15 | 73.33 / 100 Information coverage 15/15 | 73.33 / 100 Information coverage 15/15 |
| Offer termsWeight 15% | 41.67 / 100 Information coverage 12/15 | — / 100 Information coverage 0/15 | 38.46 / 100 Information coverage 13/15 |
| Privacy & account protectionWeight 10% | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 7/10 | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 3/10 | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 10/10 |
| Website usabilityWeight 5% | 75.00 / 100 Information coverage 4/5 | 50.00 / 100 Information coverage 4/5 | 75.00 / 100 Information coverage 4/5 |
Scoring methodology
Why are scores relatively low?
Unknown items are excluded from the evidence-score denominator. The composite score includes brand awareness; it is not independently tested service quality. Coverage measures documented information. Confidence measures source strength, not safety. Evidence score = weighted points ÷ known weight × 100, plus the licence bonus. Composite score = evidence score + brand awareness bonus, capped at 100. Eligible brands are ranked by this same composite score. Coverage and evidence confidence are shown separately and do not change the ordering.
Can a platform be ranked without a licence?
Yes, with at least 20% information coverage and identifiable sources in at least three categories. Coverage below 50% indicates limited information but still permits a provisional ranking. Licence images and numbers can earn tiered disclosure bonus points. The full 5 points require a valid regulatory record explicitly covering the domain. Actual bonuses are shown for each platform.
Does coverage indicate trustworthiness?
No. Coverage measures the weight of criteria supported by available evidence. It does not verify that a platform follows its claims or that funds are safe.
Model: brand-evidence-4.1
How scores and rankings work
Unknown items are excluded from the evidence-score denominator. The composite score includes brand awareness; it is not independently tested service quality. Coverage measures documented information. Confidence measures source strength, not safety.
Evidence score = weighted points ÷ known weight × 100, plus the licence bonus. Composite score = evidence score + brand awareness bonus, capped at 100. Eligible brands are ranked by this same composite score. Coverage and evidence confidence are shown separately and do not change the ordering.
Platform statements: 60; identified independent sources: 70; documented experience: 80; regulatory evidence: 90; unclassified sources: 35; records without a retained reference: 25. These are editorial source-strength values, not verification probabilities. Each criterion uses its strongest applicable source only. Unresolved conflicts reduce its confidence by 25%. Ranking requires at least 20% coverage across 3 dimensions.
The core score uses 25 public-information criteria with a total weight of 100%. Domain history, external disputes and cryptocurrency payments are supplementary and do not affect core information coverage. Bonus cancellation, game interruptions and marketing opt-out information appear alongside the relevant criteria without separate or duplicate points. Deposit support does not establish confirmed withdrawal support. Explicit adverse terms and dispute records remain visible.
The composite score includes a brand awareness bonus of 0–10 points, capped at 100. Provisional rankings use this same composite score. Evidence confidence, coverage and eligibility remain separate indicators. This is an editorial assessment of brand awareness, not a measured audience statistic.